System and architecture
Helps users find datasets by the type of model system without forcing one label.
Examples: Organoid, spheroid, tissue chip, organ-on-chip, body-on-chip, barrier model, perfused system, hybrid/custom system.
Open-source ecosystem for in vitro and microphysiological systemsContributor metadata
PhysioVerse uses flexible component and process descriptors so contributors can describe complex model systems without forcing one label. The same metadata helps reviewers evaluate submissions and helps users find relevant datasets later.
Contributor access note
Anyone can use the public MPS Engine to search and compare study metadata without signing in. Contributors who want to add raw or processed data directly to PhysioVerse must sign up or sign in before uploading omics, imaging, functional data, ZIP packages, metadata files, repository links, or supporting documents. After signing in, contributors can complete the submission workflow and keep metadata connected to each contributed dataset record.
Why this matters
Terms such as organoid, organ-on-chip, body-on-chip, and tissue chip are useful, but they do not always describe what a system contains or how it was generated. Many datasets include multiple cell sources, materials, devices, culture processes, perturbations, assays, and data modalities.
PhysioVerse therefore asks contributors to describe the dataset through searchable descriptors. Contributors can select multiple options and add an explanation when they choose Other or when a system does not fit existing choices.
View Submission GuideDescriptor groups
These descriptor groups are used in the submission form and in the Find Data filters. They are meant to be flexible: contributors can select more than one option and use Other when a term is missing.
Helps users find datasets by the type of model system without forcing one label.
Examples: Organoid, spheroid, tissue chip, organ-on-chip, body-on-chip, barrier model, perfused system, hybrid/custom system.
Describes where the biological material comes from and what it represents.
Examples: Primary, tumor-derived, iPSC-derived, immortalized, co-culture, species, tissue or organ, disease context.
Captures the physical and biological parts that influence system behavior.
Examples: Epithelial, endothelial, immune, stromal, neuronal, or cardiac components; scaffold, matrix, hydrogel, device material, flow or mechanical context.
Explains how the system was generated, maintained, matured, treated, or challenged.
Examples: Directed differentiation, self-assembly, perfusion, maturation, drug exposure, toxicant exposure, infection, hypoxia, or genetic perturbation.
Connects what was measured to the files or repository links provided by the contributor.
Examples: Imaging, histology, transcriptomics, single-cell data, proteomics, metabolomics, functional assays, TEER, permeability, viability, secretion, longitudinal measurements.
Keeps uploaded data, metadata files, ZIP packages, external links, and processing history connected to the dataset record.
Examples: Raw files, processed files, dataset package ZIP, sample metadata, experimental design file, data dictionary, protocol, README, DOI, accession, repository link.
Required and optional metadata
PhysioVerse should not make contributors enter fields that do not apply. Core fields are required so a dataset can be identified, attributed, reviewed, and discovered. More detailed sample, treatment, dose, time point, and replicate information should be added when available or relevant.
Optional when applicable
Optional fields are still valuable. They help reviewers and future users understand sample groups, comparisons, treatments, time points, and file-to-sample relationships. When these details are not relevant, contributors can leave them blank.
Using Other
If a contributor chooses Other or describes a custom system, they should add a short explanation. That explanation helps reviewers understand the submission and may help improve future descriptor choices.
This keeps the metadata model flexible without losing the structure needed for search, review, and reuse.
Prepare metadata
Review the submission guide, prepare core descriptors, and sign in when you are ready to create a dataset record, upload files, link repositories, or submit for review.
Standards and manufacturing partners
Connect with the organizations advancing consensus standards, validation, and regenerative manufacturing across the PhysioVerse ecosystem.
The Microphysiological and Organoid Systems Standards Development Organization (MOSSDO) is a federally funded multi-stakeholder initiative focused specifically on establishing consensus-based standards for organoids, microphysiological systems (MPS), and body-on-a-chip technologies. MOSSDO develops frameworks for reproducibility, validation, and interoperability, enabling these platforms to be more reliably adopted across research, regulatory, and translational settings. In coordination with enabling ecosystem efforts such as PhysioVerse, MOSSDO provides the standards foundation that supports data integration, comparability, and broader field-wide adoption.
The Regenerative Manufacturing Innovation Consortium (RegMIC), founded in 2014, is a national initiative that brings together stakeholders from industry, academia, and government to advance the manufacturing, scale-up, and commercialization of regenerative technologies. Through cross-sector collaboration, RegMIC addresses key challenges in translation, including process development, regulatory alignment, and the establishment of best practices across cell, tissue, and advanced in vitro systems.